Ahhh, is that where my MKIII box came from? Arrived yesterday and heading out the door to Jimmy Behan for a buildinnerflight wrote:I do remember him selling some enclosures on eBay, I got some from him but not sure on the timeline of things
JMI Trash
Moderator: The Captain
- Gary
- Posts: 527
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Larne, Northern Ireland
Re: JMI Trash
- innerflight
- Posts: 4930
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:27 am
- Location: The Ferry
Re: JMI Trash
No not that one, this was a while ago, that one came direct from bpcGary wrote:Ahhh, is that where my MKIII box came from? Arrived yesterday and heading out the door to Jimmy Behan for a buildinnerflight wrote:I do remember him selling some enclosures on eBay, I got some from him but not sure on the timeline of things
glad it got there safely
’brutish in character but not thug like’
- Gary
- Posts: 527
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Larne, Northern Ireland
- Radiotron
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:57 pm
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: JMI Trash
Time-line mix up on my part, sorry about thatDoc Holliday wrote:I thought the VPW guy worked for JMI before leaving and setting up VPW?
Still weird he would be using transistors if they were obviously flawed, seemed like a knowledgeable guy
- Doc Holliday
- Posts: 3263
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 10:41 pm
- Location: UK West Midlands
Re: JMI Trash
Hey no probs, I struggle to keep up with it all tbh. I just remember * sola = original & JMI = dirty theiving Bastards :D
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 4:04 am
Re: JMI Trash
Sorry for late reply. Yes, same transistors in the VPW pedals, at least some of them. Our rejected OC75's. Had to see one to confirm. We've been having germanium transistors made intermittently since ~2009. From the few VPW pedals that have passed through my hands I'd say Steve G does/did good work IMO. Not all of our rejected devices were necessarily "bad", which is subjective, they just didn't meet the qualifications for transistors that went in to my builds. I didn't like them, so they went back.
As for JMI/BPW, my mother always used to say, "if you don't have anything good to say......"
As for JMI/BPW, my mother always used to say, "if you don't have anything good to say......"
- Sgtfuzz
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 pm
Re: JMI Trash
I'm just curious if the transistors you were having made were the ones used in the point to point germanium Sonic Boom effects pedals? Also, what's the best way to identify the rejected transistors that you had made? Mainly the OC75s, as I have one VPW Supafuzz from years ago when Steve Giles first started his company.Acid Fuzz wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:28 pm Sorry for late reply. Yes, same transistors in the VPW pedals, at least some of them. Our rejected OC75's. Had to see one to confirm. We've been having germanium transistors made intermittently since ~2009. From the few VPW pedals that have passed through my hands I'd say Steve G does/did good work IMO. Not all of our rejected devices were necessarily "bad", which is subjective, they just didn't meet the qualifications for transistors that went in to my builds. I didn't like them, so they went back.
As for JMI/BPW, my mother always used to say, "if you don't have anything good to say......"
Thanks
- 1bottlerocket
- Posts: 8564
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:45 pm
- Location: The Land of Milk and Honey
Re: JMI Trash
I was also wondering how you could identify the transistors as rejects you once had. Were they marked in some way?Sergeant Fuzz wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2018 2:35 amI'm just curious if the transistors you were having made were the ones used in the point to point germanium Sonic Boom effects pedals? Also, what's the best way to identify the rejected transistors that you had made? Mainly the OC75s, as I have one VPW Supafuzz from years ago when Steve Giles first started his company.Acid Fuzz wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:28 pm Sorry for late reply. Yes, same transistors in the VPW pedals, at least some of them. Our rejected OC75's. Had to see one to confirm. We've been having germanium transistors made intermittently since ~2009. From the few VPW pedals that have passed through my hands I'd say Steve G does/did good work IMO. Not all of our rejected devices were necessarily "bad", which is subjective, they just didn't meet the qualifications for transistors that went in to my builds. I didn't like them, so they went back.
As for JMI/BPW, my mother always used to say, "if you don't have anything good to say......"
Thanks
Never argue with an idiot, they bring you down to their level and beat you with experience
-Garfunk M. Rafferty
_________________________________________
For all things stomp: http://www.effectsdatabase.com/
Big Muff History Page: http://bigmuffpage.com/
-Garfunk M. Rafferty
_________________________________________
For all things stomp: http://www.effectsdatabase.com/
Big Muff History Page: http://bigmuffpage.com/
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 4:04 am
Re: JMI Trash
"I'm just curious if the transistors you were having made were the ones used in the point to point germanium Sonic Boom effects pedals?" No, we've never used any of the Acid Fuzz transistors in any Sonic Boom builds. All the Sonic Booms with germanium fuzz have NOS transistors. Real New Old Stock, not JMI "NOS"
"Also, what's the best way to identify the rejected transistors that you had made? Mainly the OC75s, as I have one VPW Supafuzz from years ago when Steve Giles first started his company."
Thanks"
The quick easy way to know for sure is simply by looking at the physical package/encapsulation/can and the print on it. Back in 2009-2010 we had test batches of OC75's made by NJS exclusively. Those ~all look the same. Pretty much any "mojo" tranny # like OC75 or 2G381, etc.... that has "NJS" on the package is one of our rejects. The OC75's from those early batches were all in the classic metal SO-2 package. However, NONE of our OC75's were in the black glass SO-2 encapsulation like the 60's Mullards or the later DSI OC81D's. We've never printed "Mullard" or any other brand than NJS or the current manufacturer on any of our transistors, so you don't have to worry about "fake" Mullards or fake/counterfeit anything else, at least not from Acid Fuzz. If your VPW has metal can SO-2 OC75's then they are our rejects. If it has black glass Mullards, then safe to say, that's what it has. I think that covers anything you'd see in a VPW pedal or JMI.
Our large production runs did not have the "NJS" print on the package and none of our later runs from any manufacturer have a brand/make, simply "OC75" & the date code. The date codes are obvious.
Incidentally, my primary aim in making transistors was always to get a great SOUNDING transistor so we can keep the fuzz party they started in the 60's going for years in to the future. Aesthetics took a back seat. I dig groovy enclosures & graphics, but caring a lot about what new production transistors themselves look like inside a pedal where no one sees them is a level of model making contest nerd that I just don't see the point of. That being said, I did go through great lengths to make sure our early transistors were at least in the classic SO-2 package, if possible, for as long as possible because I was under the (mistaken) impression that it may have something to do with the sound. You see, not only did devices like Mullard OC75's end production decades ago. Production of the SO-2 package they were in also ended then. None of our manufacturers had these, because they haven't been used in decades. So I had to track down NOS packages and provide them. At this point I think that is a total PITA & not worth the effort at all IMO.
"Also, what's the best way to identify the rejected transistors that you had made? Mainly the OC75s, as I have one VPW Supafuzz from years ago when Steve Giles first started his company."
Thanks"
The quick easy way to know for sure is simply by looking at the physical package/encapsulation/can and the print on it. Back in 2009-2010 we had test batches of OC75's made by NJS exclusively. Those ~all look the same. Pretty much any "mojo" tranny # like OC75 or 2G381, etc.... that has "NJS" on the package is one of our rejects. The OC75's from those early batches were all in the classic metal SO-2 package. However, NONE of our OC75's were in the black glass SO-2 encapsulation like the 60's Mullards or the later DSI OC81D's. We've never printed "Mullard" or any other brand than NJS or the current manufacturer on any of our transistors, so you don't have to worry about "fake" Mullards or fake/counterfeit anything else, at least not from Acid Fuzz. If your VPW has metal can SO-2 OC75's then they are our rejects. If it has black glass Mullards, then safe to say, that's what it has. I think that covers anything you'd see in a VPW pedal or JMI.
Our large production runs did not have the "NJS" print on the package and none of our later runs from any manufacturer have a brand/make, simply "OC75" & the date code. The date codes are obvious.
Incidentally, my primary aim in making transistors was always to get a great SOUNDING transistor so we can keep the fuzz party they started in the 60's going for years in to the future. Aesthetics took a back seat. I dig groovy enclosures & graphics, but caring a lot about what new production transistors themselves look like inside a pedal where no one sees them is a level of model making contest nerd that I just don't see the point of. That being said, I did go through great lengths to make sure our early transistors were at least in the classic SO-2 package, if possible, for as long as possible because I was under the (mistaken) impression that it may have something to do with the sound. You see, not only did devices like Mullard OC75's end production decades ago. Production of the SO-2 package they were in also ended then. None of our manufacturers had these, because they haven't been used in decades. So I had to track down NOS packages and provide them. At this point I think that is a total PITA & not worth the effort at all IMO.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 12 guests