Or the other way around.
Ant, was the MK I.V an "official" prototype... for Arbiter ?
Moderator: The Captain
- Laundromat
- Posts: 2673
- Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 4:13 pm
- Location: Finland
Re: Ant, was the MK I.V an "official" prototype... for Arbiter ?
Condolences, the bums lost!
- Philip
- Posts: 10413
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 9:22 pm
Re: Ant, was the MK I.V an "official" prototype... for Arbiter ?
Meaning Sola took a FF? The Vox and Sola quite clearly pre date the FF, no?
- Philip
- Posts: 10413
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 9:22 pm
- get_with_it
- Sola Sound London
- Posts: 1451
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:26 am
Re: Ant, was the MK I.V an "official" prototype... for Arbiter ?
Hello
Well - the way I understood it is we made a bunch of pedals for loads of different companies with various circuits in them with a view to making pedals for them .
But don't read anything sinister into what I said - I was just trying to say the 1.5 circuit became the fuzz face - Personally , I think it was via the Fuzz Bug we made for Dallas who were obviously very closely linked to Arbiter . In short I was just trying to say we've made some cool fuzz pedals and that's why We've written a book .
So - feel free to call it iffy sales talk - i really wasn't trying to say anything of great magnitude or saying anyone copied or ripped ff anyone else - I was just being interviewed whilst being a bit ill in a really noisy place - it was horrible !!!
AND I LOOK REALLY FAT !¬!!!!
Ant
Well - the way I understood it is we made a bunch of pedals for loads of different companies with various circuits in them with a view to making pedals for them .
But don't read anything sinister into what I said - I was just trying to say the 1.5 circuit became the fuzz face - Personally , I think it was via the Fuzz Bug we made for Dallas who were obviously very closely linked to Arbiter . In short I was just trying to say we've made some cool fuzz pedals and that's why We've written a book .
So - feel free to call it iffy sales talk - i really wasn't trying to say anything of great magnitude or saying anyone copied or ripped ff anyone else - I was just being interviewed whilst being a bit ill in a really noisy place - it was horrible !!!
AND I LOOK REALLY FAT !¬!!!!
Ant
- Electric Warrior
- Posts: 3620
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 2:19 am
Re: Ant, was the MK I.V an "official" prototype... for Arbiter ?
Yeah. The MK1.5 must have been introduced early in 1966, maybe even earlier. The earliest Fuzz Faces seem to date to fall of 1966. Some early british Vox Distortion Boosters were FZ-1 based, btw. We have no idea when Vox started selling the shunt-series feedback amplifier types.
The Fuzz Face was clearly based on a MK1.5 and not a Distortion Booster or italian Vox Tone Bender.
That would have been made for Dallas, no? Were they already involved with Arbiter at that point?get_with_it wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 2:01 pm Hello
Well - the way I understood it is we made a bunch of pedals for loads of different companies with various circuits in them with a view to making pedals for them .
But don't read anything sinister into what I said - I was just trying to say the 1.5 circuit became the fuzz face - Personally , I think it was via the Fuzz Bug we made for Dallas who were obviously very closely linked to Arbiter . In short I was just trying to say we've made some cool fuzz pedals and that's why We've written a book .
So - feel free to call it iffy sales talk - i really wasn't trying to say anything of great magnitude or saying anyone copied or ripped ff anyone else - I was just being interviewed whilst being a bit ill in a really noisy place - it was horrible !!!
AND I LOOK REALLY FAT !¬!!!!
Ant
Everything is transitional.
- Philip
- Posts: 10413
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 9:22 pm
Re: Ant, was the MK I.V an "official" prototype... for Arbiter ?
Electric Warrior wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 2:12 pm Some early british Vox Distortion Boosters were FZ-1 based, btw. We have no idea when Vox started selling the shunt-series feedback amplifier types.
- Electric Warrior
- Posts: 3620
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 2:19 am
Re: Ant, was the MK I.V an "official" prototype... for Arbiter ?
According to this site Dallas aquired Arbiter Electronics in 1965. It all makes sense.
http://soundcitysite.com/history_2.htm
http://soundcitysite.com/history_2.htm
Everything is transitional.
- stella_blues
- Posts: 2356
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:11 pm
- Location: Auld Reekie
Re: Ant, was the MK I.V an "official" prototype... for Arbiter ?
So circuit wise, what’s the difference between a MK1.5, Fuzz Face and the Italian Vox tonebender, and what makes them all sound so different?
- Philip
- Posts: 10413
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 9:22 pm
Re: Ant, was the MK I.V an "official" prototype... for Arbiter ?
So what Ant said is essentially right.
- rafmax
- Posts: 2468
- Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 5:11 pm
- Location: Tour Eiffel
Re: Ant, was the MK I.V an "official" prototype... for Arbiter ?
Thanks Ant
get_with_it wrote: ↑Mon Apr 02, 2018 2:01 pm Hello
Well - the way I understood it is we made a bunch of pedals for loads of different companies with various circuits in them with a view to making pedals for them .
Ant
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests