Tone Bender MKII mojo
Moderator: The Captain
- Electric Warrior
- Posts: 3620
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 2:19 am
Tone Bender MKII mojo
first off, I hope discussing MKII tweaks is not against this forum's rules. If it is, I'm terribly sorry. please feel free to delete this thread in that case.
I'm planning to build an MKII soon, but I'm not sure about some details.
This is the layout I'm using: It's based on a layout that Chris Brown posted over at diystompboxes.com.
I've already changed the resistor values to OC75-Bender style values (spent hours comparing photos of different MKII variants to double check if they're right).
The capacitor values are rather hard to make out in the pictures I've found. Are the values in the layout in the right ballpark?
I have several Philips OC75 and OC76 transistors as well as some Matsushita 2SB172s. Any recommendations regarding hfe/leakage selection? 70/70/100 seems to be popular and I've got OC75s in that ballpark. Q1 should be medium leakage, while Q2 should be low, right? Any different opinions?
then there's the bias thing... many people recommend to bias Q2 and Q3 like a germanium fuzz face and Q1 as if it was a Rangemaster (collector voltage of Q1 around 7V, Q2 around 0,5V and Q3 around 5V) and I can see why they do it, as the circuits are rather similar. but is that really what I should go for?
could anybody help me with this, please?
I'm planning to build an MKII soon, but I'm not sure about some details.
This is the layout I'm using: It's based on a layout that Chris Brown posted over at diystompboxes.com.
I've already changed the resistor values to OC75-Bender style values (spent hours comparing photos of different MKII variants to double check if they're right).
The capacitor values are rather hard to make out in the pictures I've found. Are the values in the layout in the right ballpark?
I have several Philips OC75 and OC76 transistors as well as some Matsushita 2SB172s. Any recommendations regarding hfe/leakage selection? 70/70/100 seems to be popular and I've got OC75s in that ballpark. Q1 should be medium leakage, while Q2 should be low, right? Any different opinions?
then there's the bias thing... many people recommend to bias Q2 and Q3 like a germanium fuzz face and Q1 as if it was a Rangemaster (collector voltage of Q1 around 7V, Q2 around 0,5V and Q3 around 5V) and I can see why they do it, as the circuits are rather similar. but is that really what I should go for?
could anybody help me with this, please?
Everything is transitional.
- Creepyfingers
- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:59 pm
Re: Tone Bender MKII mojo
Yo
Your ears are very important when it comes to biasing...
--Brad
Your ears are very important when it comes to biasing...
--Brad
-
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 9:05 am
Re: Tone Bender MKII mojo
Creepyfingers wrote:Yo
Your ears are the most important thing when it comes to biasing...
--Brad
Fixed.
I would suggest to the OP that he build the circuit on the breadboard, check voltages, make adjustments, etc BEFORE committing it to vero board. The TB MKII is an amazing sounding circuit when built correctly, and a freaking horrible sounding circuit when done wrong. Either you test it on a breadboard and "tweak", or you build a hundred MKII's to discover some of their "secrets".
Best of luck.
- Electric Warrior
- Posts: 3620
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 2:19 am
Re: Tone Bender MKII mojo
I will use sockets for the transistors and some trim pots to find the resistor values I like. The problem is: I have no clue what a good tone bender is supposed to sound like with my rig.
Everything is transitional.
-
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 9:05 am
Re: Tone Bender MKII mojo
Thats where your ears come in.Electric Warrior wrote:I will use sockets for the transistors and some trim pots to find the resistor values I like. The problem is: I have no clue what a good tone bender is supposed to sound like with my rig.
In the immortal words of Joe Meek ... "if it sounds good, it is good".
- Electric Warrior
- Posts: 3620
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 2:19 am
- Electric Warrior
- Posts: 3620
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 2:19 am
- Electric Warrior
- Posts: 3620
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 2:19 am
Re: Tone Bender MKII mojo
parts:
quick layout test (don't worry about the wrong resistor values) - maybe I should have chosen smaller resistors, it might have fitted a B-sized enclosure... but these 2 watt metal films look so sweet...
quick layout test (don't worry about the wrong resistor values) - maybe I should have chosen smaller resistors, it might have fitted a B-sized enclosure... but these 2 watt metal films look so sweet...
Everything is transitional.
- tatter
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:22 pm
- Location: Blackpool, England
Re: Tone Bender MKII mojo
If you test all your transistors first on breadboard you won't need the sockets (which spoil the look a bit i think) then you could just solder the transistors directly. Just make sure you solder them quickly or you'll damage the transistors.
If you're using the original layout may as well go the whole way!
If you're using the original layout may as well go the whole way!
http://www.myspace.com/sinisterfootwear
http://www.reverbnation.com/sinisterfootwear
Fender Vintage Player Stratocaster > D*A*M AA > Arion SAD-1 > Line 6 M9 > Ibanez 850 Mini Fuzz > CAE Boost / Line Driver
http://www.reverbnation.com/sinisterfootwear
Fender Vintage Player Stratocaster > D*A*M AA > Arion SAD-1 > Line 6 M9 > Ibanez 850 Mini Fuzz > CAE Boost / Line Driver
- Electric Warrior
- Posts: 3620
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 2:19 am
Re: Tone Bender MKII mojo
true - but I would have to buy a breadboard and I'm short on money
if it turns out that I'm sure that I really like the transistors I might just solder them to the board..
if it turns out that I'm sure that I really like the transistors I might just solder them to the board..
Everything is transitional.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests