School me on OC75's

Schematics, layouts & other technical mumbo jumbo.

Moderator: The Captain

User avatar
Snufkino
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 11:11 pm
Location: Fuzzwell UK

School me on OC75's

Post by Snufkino »

I'm going to put together a Marshall Supa Fuzz, but have never really delved into Mk.II's so I have some noob questions... For a start, what are your preferred gain ranges for the Supa? Is there a typical average, can you go high gain and destroy worlds? Are their any reliable sources to get NOS, or am I going to have to risk ebay, or settle for a modern alternative? Are their any tell-tale signs of a fake? What do they taste like?

:cheers:
User avatar
peps1
Posts: 2173
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:52 am
Location: Hastings UK

Post by peps1 »

Personally (as I'm sure lots of people have different opinions on this!) start with the following as my rough starting place:

Q1 150 - 170 Hfe
Q2 190 - 210 Hfe
Q3 180 - 200 Hfe

But switching them all and finding the best combination is best, so I would suggest getting a couple more then you need, so you can play about a little.

Reliable NOS sources http://www.langrex.co.uk have them in stock, I got a hundred from them last year, was very happy with them....think they are about £7 each and for a little extra will do them for you in a requested Hfe range.
Image
User avatar
Radiotron
Posts: 684
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:57 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Re: School me on OC75's

Post by Radiotron »

Are you sure those are the correct values for the OC75’s you use? They seem excessively high to me :hmm:
I like mine in the 55-90 range. Anything over 100 Hfe is pretty rare already and I don’t usually like the sound of those in a Mk-II, but, as you said, to each his own :cheers:
User avatar
PlumCrazy
Posts: 761
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 1:38 am
Location: Mpls, MN

Re: School me on OC75's

Post by PlumCrazy »

I had a bunch of Philips OC75s (they have a flatter top and large lettering). They were almost all bad and leaky. Worst waste of money ever. I'd stay away from those.
http://www.plumcrazyfx.com
Everytime i comb my hair, thoughts of u get in my eyes.
User avatar
Radiotron
Posts: 684
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:57 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Re: School me on OC75's

Post by Radiotron »

Flat tops are quite different (late production I believe)
Round top OC75's are excellent transistors, that's my experience anyway
User avatar
peps1
Posts: 2173
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:52 am
Location: Hastings UK

Re: School me on OC75's

Post by peps1 »

Radiotron wrote:Are you sure those are the correct values for the OC75’s you use? They seem excessively high to me :hmm:
I like mine in the 55-90 range. Anything over 100 Hfe is pretty rare already and I don’t usually like the sound of those in a Mk-II, but, as you said, to each his own :cheers:
Yeah, they are the Hfe's I use, not had a problem finding OC75's in the 200 range :hmm:

Got the numbers from a old post that I believe were taken by the Captain, for a original unit I think was called "the Ex Wife" but I may have dreamed that part, or been very high at the time?

EDIT TO ADD:

Cant find the post, but printed part of the page out and stuck it in my paper folder back up of important pedal stuff...
Here is some info on my ex-wife. A 1967 Marshall Supa Fuzz.

Readings taken at 9.69 volts with a fresh 226 (PP4) cell at 25.4oC.

Q1 - hfe - 174 / ic - 0.30mA
Q2 - hfe - 208 / ic - 0.27mA
Q3 - hfe - 194 / ic - 0.23mA

Voltage on Q3's Collector was -8.95V.
Image
User avatar
Electric Warrior
Posts: 3620
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 2:19 am

Re: School me on OC75's

Post by Electric Warrior »

Maybe these hfes include leakage? The Captain once published hfe measurements of a Zonk Machine that was later re-measured by someone else getting much lower readings...

I have a couple of flat top OC75s. Yup, they're gainy and they're quite leaky, but they sound just fine in a MKII. The ones that work that is. A lot of the ones I recieved were broken, but interestingly they all had the same date (?) code, so that may have been a production error.
Everything is transitional.
User avatar
Snufkino
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 11:11 pm
Location: Fuzzwell UK

Re: School me on OC75's

Post by Snufkino »

Thanks for all the replies. :party:

Radiotron wrote:Are you sure those are the correct values for the OC75’s you use? They seem excessively high to me :hmm:
I like mine in the 55-90 range. Anything over 100 Hfe is pretty rare already and I don’t usually like the sound of those in a Mk-II, but, as you said, to each his own :cheers:
What do you not like about high gain Mk.II's?
User avatar
Radiotron
Posts: 684
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 9:57 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Re: School me on OC75's

Post by Radiotron »

Electric Warrior wrote:Maybe these hfes include leakage?.
Must be something like that.
I use a DCA, and out of the thousands of OC75's I tested I'd say 95% fall into the 40-100 range.

Some production runs test higher than others, but not by that much.
Snufkino wrote:What do you not like about high gain Mk.II's?
Personally I find I don't get a wide range out the attack pot with gains high as that,
also, I just don't really care for the sound, just too much for me, kinda blatty sounding.

Again, just my opinion
User avatar
peps1
Posts: 2173
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:52 am
Location: Hastings UK

Re: School me on OC75's

Post by peps1 »

Radiotron wrote: I use a DCA, and out of the thousands of OC75's I tested I'd say 95% fall into the 40-100 range.
Genuinely interesting!

I'm sorting through a load of OC75 for some MKI builds and using my DCA here are the Hfe of what I have sorted so far (only a small sample of 88 tested so far):

0-60 = 4
70-80 = 1
90-99 = 3
100-109 = 10
110-129 = 15
130-139 = 7
140-149 = 8
150-159 = 9
160-169 = 9
170-179 = 1
180-189 = 6
190 -200 = 7
200+ = 8
Radiotron wrote:Personally I find I don't get a wide range out the attack pot with gains high as that,
also, I just don't really care for the sound, just too much for me, kinda blatty sounding.

Again, just my opinion
Yes, this what it comes down to, its totally subjective, so hard for anyone to be right or wrong........MKI pedals are another one, there are some widely differing opinions on what a MKI should sound like, how much gate/decay and so on, and you just have to see Grahams videos to see the differences even in original units.

Image
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests